| com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.Reasoner
All known Subclasses: com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.impl.oldCode.BasicBackwardRuleReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.OWLMiniReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.BasicForwardRuleReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rdfsReasoner1.RDFSReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.dig.DIGReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.transitiveReasoner.TransitiveReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.impl.oldCode.FBLPRuleReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.LPBackwardRuleReasoner, com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.OWLMicroReasoner,
Reasoner | public interface Reasoner (Code) | | The minimal interface to which all reasoners (or reasoner adaptors) conform.
This only supports attaching the reasoner to a set of RDF graphs
which represent the rules or ontologies and instance data. The actual
reasoner requests are made through the InfGraph which is generated once
the reasoner has been bound to a set of RDF data.
author: Dave Reynolds version: $Revision: 1.20 $ on $Date: 2008/01/02 12:07:00 $ |
Method Summary | |
public void | addDescription(Model configSpec, Resource base) Add a configuration description for this reasoner into a partial
configuration specification model. | public InfGraph | bind(Graph data) Attach the reasoner to a set of RDF data to process.
The reasoner may already have been bound to specific rules or ontology
axioms (encoded in RDF) through earlier bindRuleset calls.
Parameters: data - the RDF data to be processed, some reasoners may restrictthe range of RDF which is legal here (e.g. | public Reasoner | bindSchema(Graph tbox) This is most commonly used to attach an ontology (a set of tbox
axioms in description logics jargon) to a reasoner. | public Reasoner | bindSchema(Model tbox) This is most commonly used to attach an ontology (a set of tbox
axioms in description logics jargon) to a reasoner. | public Capabilities | getGraphCapabilities() Return the Jena Graph Capabilties that the inference graphs generated
by this reasoner are expected to conform to. | public Model | getReasonerCapabilities() Return a description of the capabilities of this reasoner encoded in
RDF. | public void | setDerivationLogging(boolean logOn) Switch on/off drivation logging.
If set to true then the InfGraph created from the bind operation will start
life with recording of derivations switched on. | public void | setParameter(Property parameterUri, Object value) Set a configuration parameter for the reasoner. | public boolean | supportsProperty(Property property) Determine whether the given property is recognized and treated specially
by this reasoner. |
addDescription | public void addDescription(Model configSpec, Resource base)(Code) | | Add a configuration description for this reasoner into a partial
configuration specification model.
Parameters: configSpec - a Model into which the configuration information should be placed Parameters: base - the Resource to which the configuration parameters should be added. |
bind | public InfGraph bind(Graph data) throws ReasonerException(Code) | | Attach the reasoner to a set of RDF data to process.
The reasoner may already have been bound to specific rules or ontology
axioms (encoded in RDF) through earlier bindRuleset calls.
Parameters: data - the RDF data to be processed, some reasoners may restrictthe range of RDF which is legal here (e.g. syntactic restrictions in OWL). an inference graph through which the data+reasoner can be queried. throws: ReasonerException - if the data is ill-formed according to theconstraints imposed by this reasoner. |
bindSchema | public Reasoner bindSchema(Graph tbox) throws ReasonerException(Code) | | This is most commonly used to attach an ontology (a set of tbox
axioms in description logics jargon) to a reasoner. A certain amount
of precomputation may be done at this time (e.g. constructing the
class lattice). When the reasoner is later applied some instance data
these cached precomputations may be reused.
In fact this call may be more general than the above
description suggests. Firstly, a reasoner that supports arbitrary rules
rather than ontologies may use the same method to bind the reasoner
to the specific rule set (encoded in RDF). Secondly, even in the ontology
case a given reasoner may not require a strict separation of tbox and
abox - it may allow instance data in the tbox and terminology axioms in
the abox.
A reasoner is free to simply note this set of RDF and merge with any
future RDF rather than do processing at this time.
Parameters: tbox - the ontology axioms or rule set encoded in RDF a reasoner instace which can be used to process a data graph throws: ReasonerException - if the reasoner cannot bebound to a rule set in this way, for example if the underlying enginecan only accept a single rule set in this way and one rule set hasalready been bound in of if the ruleset is illformed. |
bindSchema | public Reasoner bindSchema(Model tbox) throws ReasonerException(Code) | | This is most commonly used to attach an ontology (a set of tbox
axioms in description logics jargon) to a reasoner. A certain amount
of precomputation may be done at this time (e.g. constructing the
class lattice). When the reasoner is later applied some instance data
these cached precomputations may be reused.
In fact this call may be more general than the above
description suggests. Firstly, a reasoner that supports arbitrary rules
rather than ontologies may use the same method to bind the reasoner
to the specific rule set (encoded in RDF). Secondly, even in the ontology
case a given reasoner may not require a strict separation of tbox and
abox - it may allow instance data in the tbox and terminology axioms in
the abox.
A reasoner is free to simply note this set of RDF and merge with any
future RDF rather than do processing at this time.
Parameters: tbox - the ontology axioms or rule set encoded in RDF a reasoner instace which can be used to process a data graph throws: ReasonerException - if the reasoner cannot bebound to a rule set in this way, for example if the underlying enginecan only accept a single rule set in this way and one rule set hasalready been bound in of if the ruleset is illformed. |
getGraphCapabilities | public Capabilities getGraphCapabilities()(Code) | | Return the Jena Graph Capabilties that the inference graphs generated
by this reasoner are expected to conform to.
|
getReasonerCapabilities | public Model getReasonerCapabilities()(Code) | | Return a description of the capabilities of this reasoner encoded in
RDF. These capabilities may be static or may depend on configuration
information supplied at construction time. May be null if there are
no useful capabilities registered.
|
setDerivationLogging | public void setDerivationLogging(boolean logOn)(Code) | | Switch on/off drivation logging.
If set to true then the InfGraph created from the bind operation will start
life with recording of derivations switched on. This is currently only of relevance
to rule-based reasoners.
Default - false.
|
setParameter | public void setParameter(Property parameterUri, Object value)(Code) | | Set a configuration parameter for the reasoner. Parameters can identified
by URI and can also be set when the Reasoner instance is created by specifying a
configuration in RDF.
Parameters: parameterUri - the property identifying the parameter to be changed Parameters: value - the new value for the parameter, typically this is a wrappedjava object like Boolean or Integer. |
supportsProperty | public boolean supportsProperty(Property property)(Code) | | Determine whether the given property is recognized and treated specially
by this reasoner. This is a convenience packaging of a special case of getCapabilities.
Parameters: property - the property which we want to ask the reasoner about true if the given property is handled specially by the reasoner. |
|
|